Updated July 2026 · Reviewed by Adams, Cameron & Co.
Yes, Florida non-compete and non-solicitation agreements can hold up, and courts have enforced them when they're properly drafted. Under Florida law, a restriction of six months or less is presumed reasonable, while one longer than two years is presumed unreasonable, and the agreement must also be reasonable in geographic scope. Agents can generally announce a move and be recontacted by former clients on their own, but they can't take or use a former brokerage’s confidential client data to do it.
- Florida law presumes a non-compete of 6 months or less is reasonable, and one over 2 years is presumed unreasonable.
- Geographic scope matters too. A restriction covering a reasonable local market is far more likely to hold up than one covering the whole state.
- Courts have enforced properly drafted agreements, so signing one isn't a formality; read it before you sign, not after you resign.
- You can generally announce your move and let former clients reach out to you on their own initiative.
- What typically gets an agent in real trouble is taking a client list or other confidential data and using it to solicit business.
Is a real estate non-compete actually enforceable in Florida?
Often, yes. It’s a common assumption among agents that non-compete clauses are unenforceable “restraint of trade” boilerplate that no court would actually uphold. That’s not how Florida treats them. Florida has a specific statute governing restrictive covenants, and courts have enforced properly drafted non-compete and non-solicitation agreements between brokerages and their agents. The key word is properly drafted. Whether a specific clause holds up depends on its length, its geographic reach, and whether it protects a legitimate business interest, like client relationships or confidential data, rather than just trying to box you in.
How long can a non-compete last and still be considered reasonable?
Florida law creates a set of presumptions based on time. A restriction of six months or less is presumed reasonable. One that runs longer than two years is presumed unreasonable. Anything in between gets evaluated on its specific facts. This doesn’t mean a 14-month clause automatically fails or a 4-month clause automatically wins. It means the burden of proof shifts depending on which side of those markers your agreement falls on. A brokerage trying to enforce a 3-year restriction is fighting an uphill legal battle from the start.
Does geographic scope matter as much as the time limit?
Yes, and agents often overlook this part. A non-compete also has to be reasonable in geographic scope, meaning it should be tied to the actual area where you did business, not an arbitrary line drawn to keep you out of an entire county or region you never really worked. A clause restricting you from soliciting clients in the specific market you served is far more defensible than one written broadly enough to keep you out of half the state. If the geographic reach looks disconnected from where your actual business was, that’s a real weakness in the clause, not just an inconvenience.
What can you actually do when you switch brokerages?
Agents generally retain the right to announce that they’ve moved, through a mailer, a social post, or simply telling people. And if a former client independently decides to reach back out to you at your new brokerage, that’s typically fine; the relationship is yours. What crosses the line is actively soliciting those clients using information that belongs to your former brokerage, especially anything considered confidential, like a client database, contact list, or transaction history you didn’t already have independent access to. The distinction real estate agents in Florida keep running into is between a client following you because they know you, versus you working from a list that wasn’t yours to take.
What actually gets agents into legal trouble?
In practice, disputes rarely center on the simple fact that an agent left. They center on how the agent left and what they took with them. Downloading a client roster before resigning, using a former brokerage’s CRM export to build a marketing campaign, or misrepresenting confidential deal information to a new employer are the kinds of actions that turn a routine brokerage switch into a legal problem. If you keep your own honest record of your own relationships as you build them, rather than relying on company systems at the moment you leave, you’re in a much stronger position.
What should you do before you sign, or before you switch?
If you’re being asked to sign a non-compete or non-solicitation agreement at a new brokerage, read the length and geographic scope carefully before you sign, since those two factors are exactly what a court weighs later. If you’re already under one and considering a move, don’t assume it’s unenforceable just because it feels restrictive. Have an attorney actually review the specific language against your specific situation. It’s a much cheaper conversation to have before you switch than after a former brokerage sends a letter.
Restrictive covenant enforceability depends on the specific agreement and facts involved. Review any non-compete or non-solicitation agreement with a licensed Florida attorney; this is educational only, not legal advice.
Finding a brokerage that doesn’t need to lock you in
The best protection against a bad non-compete dispute is joining a brokerage you don’t feel the need to escape from in the first place. Adams, Cameron & Co., the area’s largest brokerage since 1963, has built its reputation in Daytona Beach on agents who stay because of genuine support, not restrictive paperwork. If you’re weighing a move and want a straight answer about what switching would actually look like, start a conversation.
← Back to For Experienced Agents